<p> A highly effective study tool, The <b>Glannon Guide to Torts</b> uses explanatory text and multiple-choice questions to thoroughly review course content. The interactive and student-friendly <b>Glannon Guide</b> pedagogy enables students to hone their understanding of torts topics so they can be prepared and confident—in class or taking the final exam. </p> <p> <b>A complete approach to content mastery and exam preparation features:</b> </p> <ul> <li> <b>multiple-choice questions</b> that comprise a <b>comprehensive review of first-year Torts</b> </li> <li> <b>clear introductions to terms and concepts</b> that prepare students to successfully analyze and answer multiple-choice questions </li> <li> <b>analysis of correct <i>and</i> incorrect answers</b>, to clarify murky or ambiguous points of law </li> <li> <b>sophisticated but fair multiple-choice questions</b> that are neither unrealistically easy nor unnecessarily difficult </li> <li> <b>a user-friendly and interactive approach</b> that supports learning and course review for Torts, regardless of the exam format </li> <li> <b><i>The Closer</i></b>, a final question at the end of each chapter, challenges the reader to apply new concepts to a more complex problem </li> <li> <b><i>Closing Closer</i></b> questions in the last chapter offer a cumulative review of the entire course </li> </ul> <p> <b>*A Teacher’s Manual may be available for this book. Teacher’s Manuals are a professional courtesy offered to professors only. For more information or to request a copy, please contact Aspen Publishers at 800-950-5259 or legaledu@wolterskluwer.com. </b> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p>

Product Description: <b>Examples & Explanations: Remedies</b> will be a new student favorite with its tried-and-true E&E format. This problem-oriented guide is designed and organized to complement any major remedies casebook and build student comprehension in a carefully constructed, step-by-step approach...read more

In the first comprehensive study of election law since the Supreme Court decided Bush v. Gore, Richard L. Hasen rethinks the Court’s role in regulating elections. Drawing on the case files of the Warren, Burger, and Rehnquist courts, Hasen roots the Court’s intervention in political process cases to the landmark 1962 case, Baker v. Carr. The case opened the courts to a variety of election law disputes, to the point that the courts now control and direct major aspects of the American electoral process.The Supreme Court does have a crucial role to play in protecting a socially constructed “core” of political equality principles, contends Hasen, but it should leave contested questions of political equality to the political process itself. Under this standard, many of the Court’s most important election law cases from Baker to Bush have been wrongly decided.