search for books and compare prices
Tables of Contents for Social Epistemology
Chapter/Section Title
Page #
Page Count
Introduction to the Second Edition
ix
Foreword
Thomas Nickles
xxv
Preface
xxvii
PART ONE ISSUES IN DEFINING THE FIELD OF SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY
An Overview of Social Epistemology
3
28
Social Epistemology as the Goal of All Epistemology
4
6
Social Epistemology as the Pursuit of Scandal and Extravagance
10
7
Nonnormative Social Epistemology and Other Accommodating Banalities
17
7
Social Epistemology Rendered Normative and Epistemology Rendered Interesting
24
7
Social Epistemology and Social Metaphysics
31
34
Drawing the Distinction
31
5
Transcendental and Naturalistic Approaches to Representation
36
15
Naturalism among the Savages
45
2
Naturalism among the Systems
47
4
Explaining Transcendentalism Naturalistically: Bloor on Popper
51
14
PART TWO ISSUES IN THE LANGUAGE AND HISTORY OF KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION
Realism, The Moving Target of Science Studies: A Tale of Philosophers, Historians, and Sociologists in Hot Pursuit
65
34
Realism: Who's Got the Burden of Proof?
66
3
Why Is It Now So Difficult to Defeat the Realist?
69
4
Putting Scientific Realism to the Historical Test
73
12
Kuhn and the Realism of Many-Worlds
85
4
Regulative and Constitutive Realism in the Human Sciences
89
7
The Ultimate Solution to the Problem of Realism
96
3
Bearing the Burden of Proof: On the Frontier of Science and History
99
18
Feyerabend and the Problem of ``Rival Yet Incommensurable'' Theories
100
5
The Missing Link: Burden of Proof
105
6
Burden of Proof as Tacit Knowledge: Rule-Governedness
111
6
Incommensurability Explained and Defended
117
22
Ecological Incommensurability
117
11
Textual Incommensurability
128
11
The Inscrutability of Silence and the Problem of Knowledge in the Human Sciences
139
36
Inscrutability and the Analytic Philosophy of Language
139
8
Inscrutability as a Neglected but Persistent Theme in the History of the Human Sciences
147
4
Conjuring Up Inscrutability in Thought Experiments
151
7
Postscript: A Diagnosis of Davidsonism
158
17
Appendix A: How to Do Subtle Things with Words--The Ins and Outs of Conceptual Scheming
163
12
PART THREE ISSUES IN THE SOCIAL ORGANIZATION OF KNOWLEDGE
The Demarcation of Science: A Problem Whose Demise Has Been Greatly Exaggerated
175
16
Laudan and Gieryn on the Demarcation Problem
175
3
The Two Histories of Science: Of Role and Player
178
4
Science and Its Kindred Roles
182
3
Conflating Role and Player as an Historiographical Strategy
185
3
New Demarcation Criteria for Science
188
3
Disciplinary Boundaries: A Conceptual Map of the Field
191
16
The Boundedness, Autonomy, and Purity of Disciplines
191
2
Three Techniques for Detecting Disciplinary Boundaries
193
2
Are Disciplinary Boundaries Necessary for the Growth of Knowledge?
195
2
When Disciplines Collide: The Bernard Principle
197
4
Disciplinary Ambivalence: Popperian and Foucauldian Versions
201
6
The Elusiveness of Consensus in Science
207
26
Two Pure Types of Consensus and Four Mixed Ones
208
8
The Elusive Object of Consensus in Science
216
5
Consensus Rigging By Disciplinary Realignment
221
5
Implications for the Historiography of Science
226
7
From Moral Psychology to Cognitive Sociology: Making Sense of the Forman Thesis
233
30
The Social Historian in the Grip of Moral Psychology
233
6
Toward Cognitive Sociology and the Problem of Objectivity
239
5
Implications for Rewriting the Forman Thesis
244
19
Appendix B: Having Them Change against Their Will-Policy Simulations of Objectivity
251
12
PART FOUR ISSUES IN KNOWLEDGE POLICY-MAKING
Toward a Revival of the Normative in the Sociology of Knowledge
263
14
Normativity Lost
264
3
Normativity Regained
267
3
Freedom and the Administration of Knowledge Production
270
7
Social Epistemology and the Problem of Authoritarianism
277
18
The Lure and Avoidance of Cognitive Authoritarianism
277
6
Expertise Politicized and Depoliticized
283
12
Appendix C: Notes toward Designing a Core Curriculum for a Graduate Program in Knowledge Policy Studies
289
6
Bibliography
295
18
Index
313
<