search for books and compare prices
Tables of Contents for Before the Best Interests of the Child
Chapter/Section Title
Page #
Page Count
Preface
ix
 
Dorothy Burlingham
Acknowledgments
xi
 
PART ONE THE PROBLEM OUR CONVICTIONS, AND A FRAMEWORK FOR EXAMINING STATE DECISIONS TO INTRUDE ON PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIPS
The Problem and Our Convictions
3
12
The Framework
15
16
Fair Warning and power Restraint
15
4
Questions for Decision
19
2
Stages of Decision
21
2
Degrees of Intrusion
23
8
PART TWO GROUNDS FOR INTERVENTION
Introduction
28
3
Parental Requests for the State to place the Child
31
8
The Request by a Separating Parent for the Court to Determine Custody Should Be a Ground for intervention
31
2
Implications
33
1
The Request by Either or Both Parents for the Court to Terminate Their Rights in a Child Should Be a Ground for Intervention
33
6
Implications
35
4
Familial Bonds Between Children and Longtime Caretakers who Are Not Their Parents
39
20
The Request by a Child's Longtime Caretakers to Become His Parents or the Refusal by Longtime Caretakers to Relinquish Him to His Parents or to a State Agency should be a Ground for Intervention
39
20
Implications
51
8
Gross Failures of Parental Care
59
32
The Death or Disappearance of Both parents, the Only Parent, or the Custodial Parent--When coupled with Their Failure to Make Provision for Their Child's Custody and Care--Should Be a Ground for Intervention
59
3
Implications
60
2
Conviction, or Acquittal by Reason of Insanity, Sexual Offense Against One's Child Should Be a Ground for Intervention
62
10
Implications
65
7
Serious Bodily injury Inflicted by Parents upon Their Child, an Attempt to Inflict Such Injury, or the Repeated Failure of Parents to prevent Their Child from Suffering Such Injury Should Be a Ground for Intervention
72
19
Implications
75
1
Emotional Neglect
75
11
Child Abuse and Neglect
86
5
Refusal by Parents to Authorize Lifesaving Medical Care
91
20
Refusal by Parents to Authorize Medical Care When (1) Medical Experts Agree That Treatment is Nonexperimental and appropriate for the child, and (2) Denial of That Treatment Would Result in Death, and (3) the Anticipated Result of Treatment is What Society Would Want for Every Child--A Chance for Normal Healthy Growth or a Life Worth Living--Should Be a Ground for Intervention
91
20
Implications
95
1
When Death Is an Issue
95
6
When Death Is Not an Issue
101
5
When Death is an Issue Unless a Healthy Sibling provides a Transplant
106
5
The Child's Need for Legal Assistance
111
22
A Request by Parent who are Unable to Obtain Legal Assistance for Their Children, an Adjudication of Any Ground for Modifying or Terminating Parent-Child Relationships, or an Emergency Placement Pending Adjudication Should be a Ground for the Appointment of a Lawyer to Represent the Child
111
22
Implications
118
1
To Whom Is Counsel for a Child Responsible?
118
1
When Parents Engage or Request Counsel
118
3
When the Court Imposes Counsel
121
5
Should Adolescents Be Emancipated to Determine Their Own Legal Care Needs?
126
7
PART THREE THE AGONIZING DILEMMA
Too Early, Too Late, Too Much, or Too Little
133
8
PART FOUR APPENDICES
Appendix 1. On Children Killed by Their Parents
141
46
Introduction
141
3
Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Care and Supervision Provided in Relation to Maria Colwell (1974)
144
37
Comment---Had Our Grounds Been Applicable
181
6
Appendix II. Suggestions for Some Provisions of a Child Placement Code
187
10
Notes
197
72
Index
269