search for books and compare prices
Tables of Contents for Modal Syllogistics in the Middle Ages
Chapter/Section Title
Page #
Page Count
Acknowledgements
xiii
 
Abbreviations
xv
 
List of Figures and Tables
xvii
 
Introduction
1
18
Introduction
1
2
Modal syllogistic in the Prior Analytics
3
13
Medieval modal syllogistics
16
3
The First Commentators
19
39
Introduction
19
4
Division of the modalities
23
2
Necessity propositions
25
14
The syllogistic for necessity propositions
39
4
Contingency propositions
43
4
The syllogistic for contingency propositions
47
6
Related modern interpretations
53
5
Richard of Campsall
58
33
Introduction
58
3
The conversion rules
61
12
The modal syllogistic
73
11
Campsall's interpretation of the modalities
84
7
William of ockham
91
39
Introduction
91
2
The interpretation of the modalities and the truth of modal propositions
93
8
Syllogisms with modal premises in the composite sense
101
5
Syllogisms with modal premises in the divided sense
106
18
Syllogisms with mixed composite and divided modal premises
124
6
The Systematisation of Modal Syllogistics
130
35
Introduction
130
2
A note on some apparent differences between Oxford and Paris
132
4
John Buridan's analysis of modal propositions
136
7
Modal syllogistic in Buridan's works
143
6
Modal syllogistic with divided modal propositions
149
13
Buridan's system
162
3
The pseudo-scotus
165
19
Introduction
165
2
Composite modal syllogistic
167
4
Divided modal syllogistic
171
13
Buridan's Students
184
18
Introduction
184
1
Modal propositions
185
6
The conversion rules
191
5
The modal syllogistic
196
6
Modal Syllogistics in the Late Middle Ages
202
26
Introduction
202
3
The interpretation of the alethic modalities and modal propositions
205
5
The conversion rules
210
5
the modal syllogistic
215
13
Conclusion
228
5
APPENDICES
233
14
Appendix I, Valid moods for syllogisms with modal premises explicitly accepted by Aristotle in the Prior Analytics
235
1
Appendix II, Valid moods for syllogisms with uniform composite modal premises explicity accepted by William of Ockham in the Summa Logicae
236
1
Appendix III, Valid moods for syllogisms with uniform divided modal premises explicitly accepted by William of Ockham in the Summa Logicae
237
1
Appendix IV, Valid moods for syllogisms with mixed composite and divided modal premises explicitly accepted by William of Ockham in the Summa Logicae
238
1
Appendix V, Valid moods for syllogisms with uniform divided premises explicitly accepted by John Buridan in the Consequentiae and the Lectura
239
1
Appendix VI, Valid moods for syllogisms with uniform divided modal premises explicitly by Pseudo-Scotus
240
1
Appendix VII, Valid moods for syllogisms with divided modal premises explicitly accepted by Albert of Saxony and Marsilius of Inghen
241
1
Appendix VIII, Valid moods for syllogisms with divided modal premises exlicitly accepted by Jodocus Trutfetter
242
1
Appendix IX, Central concepts in modal syllogistic
243
4
1. The Aristotelian syllogistic
243
2
2. The Medieval syllogistic
245
1
3. John Buridan's octagon of opposition for modal propositions
246
1
BIBLIOGRAPHY
247
10
1. Primary sources (printed works)
247
1
2. Primary sources (manuscripts)
247
1
3. Secondary sources
248
9
Index
257